UBERKUNT.
Thursday, May 22nd, 2008holding it down…
holding it down…
Yep, we got a drop. Shits up on Nice real soon… hold tight, bucko.
For the body guard it was either this or take a bullet, tough call.
Found myself in Bali last week, a few shots from here and there.
Thanks to everyone we hung out with.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FuLPY-RvGBA[/youtube]
finally, the link between chronic masturbation and sneaker collecting revealed.
Today Sutu and I were discussing some way to express nodal information in a real-time 3d environment as a way of illustrating an idea he has about how a search engine would work in the universe that he has created through his online comic Nawlz. (Mad nerding all arvo.)
We got sidetracked and the soon turned to particle effects, (overdrive) and some of the dope things that are happening with a new open source language called Processing which focuses on image animation and interaction.
Check some examples here and here for particles being expressed as flocks of birds for a Fox Movies ad.
Here you can see Processing being used to express query bursts on Yahoo.com
I think these stylized developments in particle effects open a world of and seemingly unlimited interpretation for the classic cyber space informational flyby that is synonymous with all the artistic interpretations of Gibsons cyber-scape
Think of it like this, we can entirely reconsider how cyberspace could be expressed in our creative interpretations of the future. In this case Nawlz.
Especially when you think that futuristic interpretations of information can be subject to personal stylistic preferences and that commercial application of cyber landscapes will inevitably be highly varied and subject to trends, ect which often supercede basic functionality.
It makes sense that nodal information and could very likely be being expressed as a swarm of locusts against a stylized desert, or as a flock of birds over an ocean or the formation of ice crystals as much as it would in the tradition blur of retro 70’s light that we are familiar with.
When you start thinking of all the subtle and stylized ideas that this approach gives, working with artists, and themes the possibilities for interpretation are mad, which is all the more reason to get excited at the doors that Sutu’s Nawlz is opening for us in the exploration of cyber punk. Going to be cool to rap about this some more when Sutu gets to Melbs in June.
Zero-Tag.org is a new campaign by adidas which aims to build its brand within the street culture of Melbourne via the graff community.
It consists of a series of fake notices being plastered over graffiti and legal murals around Melbourne notifying artists that the walls will be buffed while also giving them the web address and phone number of the ficitious community group responsible. The aim is to get the irate artists to look up the site or ring the support line at which point they realise it’s all just an ad for adidas.
Its a bit of a laugh, but it’s easy to argue how ineffective this campaign is as an ACTUAL way for adidas to sell shoes and build its rep in with their target market.
The campaign shows a general misunderstanding of the street culture and reeks of some agency trying to be “clever”, “edgy” and “subversive”. Its depiction of writers is done in jest, but non the less is indicative of the general publics disrespectful perception of street art and graffiti.
It is in all ways, an outsiders approach to the culture and it should be expected that cultural marketing manager of adidas Originals Australia understand his/her brand better than to conduct such a campaign.
The message being broadcasted to us all is that adidas would prefer to make light of ignorance of community groups such as R.A.G.E’s and the controversy surrounding the illegality of graffiti in Melbourne to use it as a platform for “clever” promotions rather than focus on supporting and developing the creative and positive aspects of the culture that is it trying to sell to.
They don’t understand or care about the culture, and their pitch is disingenuous and malignant.
Earlier this year adidas turned down supporting an Australia wide tour of an art exhibition organized by Def Jams graphic designer Cey Adam, a show which was to be a massive collection highlighting and analyzing the contribution that graffiti has made to the worlds of graphic design, contemporary art and fashion over the last 25 years. We see now that they did so in favor for campaigns like this, and we wonder how the marketing manager has managed to keep his/her job.
Well turned down not quite true, adidas Originals Australia did make an offer. Which was to generously give Cey a wardrobe of adidas apparel (which he actually designed for them) in return for presenting sponsorship rights throughout Australia, and also that they’d support the show on the contingency that it was hosted in adidas originals stores. This offer shows such utter disrespect for art and street culture that I don’t know where to begin.
Its important to note that Cey’s show would have been made up of artwork from his new book, DefInition which features the likes of, A Bathing Ape, Angela Boatwright, Andre Leroy Davis, BLK MRKT, Bobbito Garcia, Brent Rollins, CAN 2, Cey Adams, Chris Yormick, law Money, COPE 2, CYCLE, Dalek, David Ellis, DL Warfield, Doze Green, EZO, Fafi, Fahamu Pecou, GIANT, Greg Larmache, Gravillis inc, Jeff Soto, HAZE, KAWS, Kehinde Wiley, Keith Haring, Kinsey, Krink, Lee Quinones, Martha Cooper, Mint+Serf, Morning Breath, INK, QUIK, REVOLT, Staple Design, SKET, Toy2R, Tristan Eaton, ZEPHYR. It is going to be an incredible book, one of the definitive pieces in the library of Hip Hop. (keep an eye out for it)
Whats more, this event would of cost a fraction of the Zero-Tag campaign. This scenarios is frustrating because it is the exact reason why adidas is incapable of reaching its brand potential.
Other brands, for example Vans have effectively promoted their branding though their association with the arts world. And they have done so by having an intimate understanding and positive involvement with the community. Through their support of artists like NeckFace, they’ve become a part of the culture, they appear to genuinely respect the culture and in turn they are genuinely respected. They haven’t isolate themselves culturally in the same way that adidas has and will continue to do through campaigns such as this.
The question is, why is adidas, which has such a strong history in street culture floundering so hard, insulting its audience and somehow getting less fashionable by the day?
From my experience the answer is based on the ignorance of their marketing teams, both locally and internationally. People who know nothing about art and culture, bubble heads with marketing degrees that are only interested in their next paid holiday and putting together an adequate presentation so they can call the job “done ” and go home to watch TV.
The only thing they did get right was to use the 20’s and 10’s “terror dome” t-shirt in their you tube video. (below)
Good to see they’ll use our t-shirts and artwork, pity they wont take our advice…
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yYGF7f0UvzM[/youtube]
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXVjTwt0HsM&feature=related[/youtube]
Hang tight for the real video later this month.